The Identity of Jon Venables

Blog Category: Current Affairs
Posted on: 25 July 2010

How many people know Jon Venables' new identity? Well, for a start, everybody who was in court 14 of the Old Bailey last Friday morning.

Given the number of times we were told his life was under threat, it was a big surprise to hear the name he adopted in 2001 being read out by the prosecutor.

We also got to hear the exact address where he had been living when he was accessing child porn on a personal computer. Not that we could report either of these details, thanks to an injunction.

One person who was in court was Denise Fergus, James Bulger's mother. There were many others - about 40 members of the press, the judge, the clerk, the usher, a shorthand writer, a handful of police and probation officers as well as about a dozen laywers (representing the prosecution, defence, Cheshire Constabulary, Media and Attorney General).

None of these people is likely to start travelling the country shouting out Venables' current name from the rooftops - but it does make you wonder why the Attorney General and Venables' barrister were so keen to maintain the injunction.

A third identity now seems inevitable, particularly as 'Jon Venables' blew his cover so spectacularly. Those who knew him in Cheshire will put two and two together, and the likelihood is that someone somewhere will broadcast his assumed name over the internet, on Twitter or Facebook, just as someone named the mother and stepfather of Baby P before the court order was lifted.

Fellow prisoners are also likely to guess who he really is, meaning he'll probably be kept in isolation for fear of attack.

In a few weeks we might be in the ludicrous situation where everybody knows Jon Venables' name but the media will still be unable to publish it for fear of being taken to court.

Jon Venables, meanwhile, will go on being Jon Venables, the the killer of two year-old James Bulger.

« Go back to the blog homepage


At 09:27:25 on 18 January 2011,  lee wrote:

bring back death penalty!

At 15:32:54 on 16 May 2011,  Jane wrote:

I couldnt agree more, with Lee's comment. Since he commited the crime, (which he, and Robert were totally responsible for their actions) and for the rest of his life, in particular, he is costing we, the taxpayers millions, so surely in these definitely cases, when his life clearly isnt worth living, under the constant threat of attacks, his death, along with Roberts would surely be justice

At 05:56:27 on 05 May 2011,  david wrote:

you can see him here

« Go back to the blog homepage

Post a comment

Post a Comment
Your name Your email address (this will not appear on the site)
Your comments
Recently Posted Blogs:
The Blog has Moved!At the Scene of a MurderMurdermap Roundup 21/8/11Mapping the Ratcliffe Highway MurdersMurdermap Weekly Roundup 14/8/11
Most Recently Commented:
A Journey through the Justice System - Part OneMurder Law - Scrap it and start again?Murder Law - Scrap it and start again?'A Reasonable Man' - the law of provocation''A Reasonable Man'' - the law of provocation
Blog Categories:
Current AffairsFilm / Books / Art / MediaFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ)Murder MapStatisticsThe Justice SystemVictim TributesWeek in ReviewAll current blogs
Blog Archive:
2011 archive2010 archiveAll current Blogs
Blog info and extras:
Blog RSS  RSS Feeds Blog Rules

CourtNewsUK menu separator Privacy menu separator Terms menu separator Accessibility menu separator Sitemap menu separator Bookmark and Share