Unsolved Murders in London: 2010

These ten cases of homicide (murder and manslaughter) in London in 2010 remain unsolved. Can you help? Call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Sukhwinder Singh, a 31-year-old builder, was stabbed in the heart after trying to stop robbers stealing a woman’s handbag.

On 8 January 2010 he chased two muggers who attacked a 28 year-old woman walking home from Barking train station along Loxford Road at around 6.40pm. He pursued them for 50 to 70 yards along Victoria Road before being stabbed. He was found fatally wounded in Uphall Road, Barking, just after 7pm and was pronounced dead at hospital.

The mugging victim’s mobile phone and handbag were not recovered, although police said the bag may have been discarded in a garage area near Charlton Crescent about 1.5 miles from the murder scene.

The stolen handbag which was never recovered

One robbery suspect was described as black, 5ft 10in-6ft tall, skinny with a young face and wearing a black hooded top and light grey jogging bottoms. The second was thought to be a lighter-skinned black man, 6ft tall, of stocky build with possible facial markings or facial hair. He was wearing a light blue hooded top with markings on the sleeves.

Detectives released CCTV footage of potential suspects and witnesses in the area. The three sections show:

  1. An area of Wakering Road leading to the underpass where the robbery victim had walked through. Footage shows her being overtaken by two men who officers need to identify as they might have seen the suspects.
  2. Two males coming out of Harvey Road, turning into Uphall Road and walking towards the area of the murder about 25 minutes before it happened. There is a third male who appears unconnected to them.
  3. A male running across the screen (from right to left) – believed to be one of the suspects running north along Uphall Road away from the murder scene shortly after it happened.

Five men were arrested in connection with the investigation but nobody has ever been charged. In 2015 DCI Dave Whellams said: “There has been no identification of the person or persons responsible. What we can hope is, that in the years since Sukhwinder was killed, allegiances of those involved, or those who know who was involved and that have kept silent, may now have changed. And that those people re-examine their consciences and consider doing the right thing and help us by coming forward.”

Call the incident room on 020 8345 3775.


Mark Corcoran was stabbed to death in the street near the Crystal Palace football ground on Valentines Day 2010.

The 26 year-old labourer staggered into the Subitha Food and Wine shop in Whitehorse Lane, South Norwood, southeast London, at around 8.20pm. CCTV pictures show him asking for help before collapsing to the floor. He bled to death at the scene from a single stab wound to the chest.

Mark Corcoran asks for help after being stabbed

Police believe Mark was stabbed within 100 yards of the shop.

Detectives appealed for witnesses who saw or spoke to Mark after 7.30pm on 14 February, the day of the FA Cup football match between Crystal Palace and Aston Villa. DCI Cliff Lyons said: “Mark was wearing a distinctive black and white stripy top and would have struggled to walk the 100 yards to the shop. Many people were around that evening, either out celebrating Valentine’s Day or at the football match and it is possible that they may have seen Mark. I would like to hear from these people no matter how insignificant their information may seem as it may assist us with finding out what happened. “

Any witnesses or anyone with information should call the incident room on 020 8721 4961.


Human rights campaigner Abdel Salam Hussain Abdel Salam, 56, was stabbed to death at his home in Boone Street, Lee, southeast London. His body was discovered at 7.10am on 13 March 2010 when a neighbour noticed his front door was open. He had been stabbed in the leg and bled to death in his hallway.

Abdel Salam, who depended on two walking sticks to get around, was last seen alive at home by his social services carer on the afternoon of Friday, 12 March. CCTV cameras captured him withdrawing cash from a cash point in Lee High Road at about 5pm that day. He was last heard from at around 9.15pm when he spoke to a friend on the phone.

Detectives said they were keeping an open mind about the motive for the murder of Mr Abdel Salam, who was well known for his work for the charity ‘Redress’ helping torture survivors.

DCI Graeme Gwyn said: ” It is clear that this was a brutal attack on a defenceless man, made more tragic as Abdel Salam had devoted much of his life combating abuse of human rights upon others. We have always believed the answer to this crime lies within the local community and someone out there has information that could greatly assist our inquiry. We continue to keep an open mind about why Abdel Salam was murdered in his own home. Please contact us with any information, no matter how small.”

Four men were arrested in 2010 but nobody was ever charged.


Errol McKenzie, 37, was shot dead on playing fields in Leyton, east London, on Sunday, 11 April 2010. The 37 year-old salesman was found with three bullet wounds to the chest in the park off Seymour Road at 12.50am. Errol, who was known as ‘Cable Guy’ because of his job fixing cable boxes and electrical equipment, was pronounced dead at the scene.

Near his body detectives found a white takeaway carton, some alcohol he bought from a shop shortly before his death, and a bag containing two cable boxes.

The investigation revealed Errol had visited an address near Northumberland Park railway station in Tottenham to discuss the sale of a cable box. He left at about 10.45pm and made his way back to Leyton. Errol was captured on CCTV in a local shop at 11.15pm before heading to the playing fields. It is believed he was in the park for at least half an hour before he was shot.

Detectives appealed for help tracing two men on bicycles captured by CCTV riding in and around the playing fields at the time of the murder. Both riders were also seen in the area earlier that night at around 7pm. One of them was wearing a dark-blue hooded top and faded blue jeans. His bike had a distinctive ‘whale tail’ mudguard. The second was seen riding along the pavement on Lea Bridge Road, carrying a bag.

Officers also hope to identify a group of males seen walking in Lea Bridge Road that night.

Detectives said there was “no obvious motive” for the murder and said they did not know why Errol went into the park

On the twelfth anniversary, the Metropolitan Police offered a reward of £20,000 for information leading to a conviction.

Errol’s daughter Nicole said in a statement: “These guys are still out there, I could be walking past them, I don’t know. We just need some justice and some peace for our family.” His nephew Tylon added: “It affects us every single year and every day. Please give our family justice and let us rest, please.”

Though years have passed, our determination to find out what happened to Errol, and bring justice to his still-grieving family, remains undiminished.

Had he arranged to meet someone? We believe he was in the park for at least half an hour before he was killed.

There are fragments of information missing that make up the whole picture of what happened to Errol, but in the passing of time allegiances and mindsets change, and I am confident that it can and will happen here.

Errol’s family still grieve for him daily, and the information you have could bring them some peace at long last.

DCI Dave Whellams of the Metropolitan Police

Anyone with information is asked to call the incident room on 0208 345 3775 or call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.


Geoffrey Bacon, a 90-year-old WWII veteran, was killed for his travel pass and £40 in cash on 26 April 2010. At around 10.45am, as he entered his flat on the second floor of the Peabody Estate in Camberwell Green, south London, he was bundled to the floor and punched in the face.

The robber, described as a light-skinned black man aged 30-40, took Mr Bacon’s wallet before searching the bedroom. He then fled the scene, shutting the front door behind him, leaving Mr Bacon on the floor of his hallway with a broken hip until a neighbour heard his cries for help. Mr Bacon spent 11 weeks in hospital recovering but never moved back to his flat and died on Thursday 5 August 2010 at a care home in Westgate-on-Sea, Kent. A special post mortem found his death was a direct result of the assault and robbery committed against him.

CCTV cameras captured Mr Bacon walking home after a shopping trip in Butterfly Walk, Camberwell.

Detectives are also investigating the circumstances of another robbery which took place minutes later on the same estate. At about 11:10hrs, a 66-year old woman using a walking stick was returning to her flat when a man grabbed her handbag. The suspect used it to hit her around the head before running off. He was described as a light-skinned black man, about 25 years old, wearing a white t-shirt and dark coloured trousers.

In a public appeal in 2013 DI Nathan Eason said: “Geoffrey was an honest, decent man who had served his country bravely in the Second World War. He had worked all his life and had earned the right to a peaceful and safe retirement. He did not deserve to have it taken from him in a cowardly attack by an assailant who used extreme force on a frail pensioner.”

Anyone with information can contact the incident room on 020 8721 4961.


Minicab driver Michael Okonko-Nwoso, 49, was attacked minutes after dropping off a fare in Abbey Wood, southeast London, in the early hours of Saturday, 19 June 2010. He was found lying injured at the back of his silver Ford Galaxy in Cookhill Road at around 4.50am. The doors of his silver Ford Galaxy were open but nothing appeared to have been stolen and the SatNav was still in the car.

Michael, who lived with his wife Catherine and their two daughters in Plumstead, died in hospital later the same day.

Police said they were unable to establish a motive but appealed for help tracing a man captured on CCTV running along the parade of shops between 4.42am and 4.44am in Eynsham Drive Abbey Wood, around the time Michael was injured. DCI Dave Manning said: “What we do know is that Michael was a law-abiding hardworking family man who died whilst going about his every day business. We know that he was in the Sewell Road area shortly after 4.30am on the day he died. We are still very keen to speak to anybody who was in Sewell Road or Cookhill Road anytime between 4am and 5am.”

CCTV image of man running near scene of attack

Four people were arrested in connection with the investigation but nobody has ever been charged. Any witnesses can call the incident room on 020 8721 4054.


Wayne Powell, a well-known DJ, was shot dead in Chingford, east London, on 5 July 2010.

The 39 year-old father-of-six had got out of his black BMW to speak to the gunman in Higham Station Avenue at around 11pm.

He was shot five times in the back with a 9mm pistol by the killer, who was described as being ‘possibly black’, five foot ten inches tall and wearing a tracksuit with a hooded top. The gunman then calmly walked off in the direction of Coningsby Gardens. 

The murder was witnessed by a female friend who was sat in the BMW. She told the inquest in March 2022: “I saw Wayne look around to his right to the drivers side window. I then saw a figure in the right walking to Wayne’s car. I thought it was a man by the way he moved. I thought he mumbled and Wayne said something back. Wayne then opened his door and pushed it up. I then heard a gunshot.”

Wayne suffered bullet wounds to his back, abdomen, left buttock, and left arm. He was pronounced dead at hospital at 1.30am on 6 July.

Detectives told the inquest that the investigation continued and that they had recovered the murder weapon.

Wayne’s brother Robert, 50, was shot dead in Harlow, Essex, in 2020 but officers said that it was unlikely the two cases were connected. Robert Powell was in custody at the time of Wayne’s death.

Wayne, who lived in Stonebridge Road, Tottenham, north London, was known as DJ Connoisseur and worked as a customer assistant for London Underground at Seven Sisters tube station. His fiancee Anne Boriel was five months pregnant with his son at the time of the murder.

Detectives said he was not involved in crime or gangs and was a popular family man. The motive remains unclear.

My partner Wayne was a good hard-working man who loved his family. When he was killed I was pregnant with his child. Baby Wayne will never get the chance to meet his daddy. Wayne’s six children will never see him again. Neither will his parents or brothers and sisters who are equally affected by this senseless killing. As DJ Connoisseur, he was well-loved on the music scene but in particular on Energy FM. On the day after his murder we were touched by the sheer volume of listeners expressing their grief and sympathy. He was universally popular. We can think of no reason why anybody would want to kill him. He was a big strong guy but never used his physical presence to bully or gain advantage; he would shy away from confrontation and help anyone whenever he could do so. This was not a gangland murder; Wayne had no links to any gang, drugs, guns or crime. Someone knew exactly where Wayne would be on the night of Monday 5 July. That person had ready access to a gun and was prepared to use it – coolly and callously. We cannot believe that person has not bragged or expressed his guilt to another about what he did. I am imploring anyone who can help identify the killer to contact the police so we can ensure no other family has to go through what we have experienced and that justice and closure can be achieved for Wayne.

Anne Boriel speaking in 2011

Two men were arrested but nobody has ever been charged. Anybody with information can call the incident room on 0208 345 3715.


MI6 spy Gareth Williams, 31, was found locked inside a bag at his flat in Pimlico, south London, on 23 August 2010. Police forced entry to flat 4, 36 Alderney Street after being alerted to his disappearance by friends, family and work colleagues. In the bathroom a red North Face holdall was lying in the bath, the zip padlocked shut. Inside, Mr Williams lay naked on top of the keys to the lock. He had bruises to both elbows, suggesting he had fought to escape before succumbing to lack of oxygen. Toxicological testing revealed no evidence of poison, drugs or other suspicious substances in his body and the cause of death remains unknown.

The locked padlock on the bag

There was no sign of a disturbance or break-in and detectives said there was no evidence anything was stolen or that items in the flat were ‘specifically posed.’

In the wardrobe detectives found a £15,000 collection of women’s clothing, including designer dresses, shoes and wigs. His mobile phone had been used in the past to access websites relating to bondage and escape from bondage, including hogtie.com, boundanna.com, artofconstriction.com and likera.com. Investigations also revealed he had made visits to a ‘drag cabaret’ and had attended two fashion courses for beginners at Central St Martins College in Clerkenwell over the previous year.

Police initially described the case as a suspicious or unexplained death rather than a murder. The investigation revealed Mr Williams had worked as a communications officer at GCHQ in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, but was on secondment to MI6 at the time of his death. He had returned to the UK from a planned holiday in the US on Wednesday 11th August 2010. Two days later he made a visit to the drag cabaret ‘Bistroteque’ in Mile End. The day after that he was caught on CCTV entering Holland Park tub station at around 3pm. On Sunday 15th August Mr Williams went shopping in Brompton Road, south Kensington, and visited the Harrods store. At around 2.30pm CCTV images show him in Hans Crescent heading towards Sloane Street near to the Dolce and Gabbana store. He was wearing a red t-shirt, beige trousers, and white trainers. This is thought to be the last confirmed sighting of him alive.

At the inquest in 2012, coroner Dr Fiona Wilcox delivered a narrative verdict on May 2 and said Gareth’s death was “unnatural and likely to have been criminally mediated.” Although there was not enough evidence to return a verdict of unlawful killing, she was “satisfied that on the balance of probabilities that Gareth was killed unlawfully.”

However on 13 November 2013, following a review of the case, the Metropolitan Police announced they had concluded their investigation and believed it was more likely to have been an accident. They also said there was no evidence his death was connected to his work.


Ricardo Cunha, 23, was shot dead in a suspected case of mistaken identity at around 11.20pm on 11 September 2010. The Portuguese window cleaner had been watching Match of the Day on TV with his girlfriend when he heard knocking on the front door his flat in Pondfield House, Elder Road, West Norwood. When he looked out the front bedroom window to investigate he was shot in the head. Ricardo was pronounced dead at the scene less than half an hour later.

The possible murder weapon

Detectives investigating the murder released a picture of a British-made Webley Mark Six revolver which may have been used in the killing. The gun was also fired during an incident on 14 September 2010 in Picton House on the Clapham Park Estate in Brixton and was found the following day on the nearby Clapham Manor Estate. It is thought to date from 1924 and may have been kept as a keepsake from the war before being stolen.

Everything in my life is missing at the moment, because he was my future. Why would someone want to take his life? This person has got the wrong guy or the wrong girl. Whoever they intended to get at that night, they got totally the wrong person.”

Ricardo’s girlfriend, Sapna

The case was featured on the BBC Crimewatch TV programme but nobody has ever been arrested or charged. A reward of £30,000 remains on offer for information leading to a conviction.

We still don’t have answers about what happened and why his life was taken so cruelly. Nothing will bring our Ricardo back to us but I want whoever did this to my son to pay for what they did. I appeal to anyone who knows or heard anything about what happened to approach the police and help us find some closure to this pain. Ricardo was such a lovely young boy, he was always ready to help everyone, always there for us and his friends. He treated everyone with respect either young or old, he spoke to everyone with kindness. So I don’t know why on earth someone would do this to Ricardo. He had all his life ahead of him, so many plans for that life, and it was all stolen from him. There is still not a day that goes by that we don’t cry at not having our Rick here with us. I strongly appeal to anyone out there that has information to come through for us and help us bring a close to all this pain.”

Statement of Ricardo’s mother Maria, issued on the tenth anniversary

Detective Sergeant Matt Flynn of the Met’s Specialist Crime Command said: “The systems in place for providing police with information have significantly moved on since Ricardo’s death. Anyone who knows the killer’s identity can chose to remain anonymous by providing the information to Crimestoppers who don’t work for police and do not share contact details. In addition, they don’t even ask for your name or record your IP address. I know that someone knows who shot this innocent man in his own home. With the passage of time allegiances can change and I am directly appealing to those people who, for whatever reason, did not come forward at the time, to use this opportunity to give us the information now. Any information provided, no matter how small, is treated in the strictest of confidence.”

Call the incident room on 020 8721 4005.


Samuel Adelagun, 16, was shot dead by masked gunmen in Plaistow, east London, at 3am on Saturday 23 October 2010.

He was walking along Upper Road with three friends when they were approached from behind by two men dressed in black with balaclavas.

Four shots were fired as they reached a patch of parkland at the junction with Chesterton Road. Samuel was hit in the chest and died at the scene.

A 15 year-old boy was hit in the abdomen but made a full recovery. The other two boys managed to escape to a nearby house.

The death of my son has greatly affected myself and my family. He is missed very much every day and his death has left a significant hole in our lives. We hope that eventually those responsible will be brought to justice.

Samuel’s mother, Ola Shokumbi

Four men aged between 20 and 23 were arrested in November 2010 but they were released with no further action and nobody has ever been charged.

In a further appeal in October 2020, Detective Sergeant Jason Grafham said: “Despite the passing of a decade, we continue to seek new information to identify those responsible for Samuel’s murder. I hope, that with the passing of ten years, and the offer of a substantial reward, someone who has information now feels they can tell us what they know, and help bring justice to Samuel’s loved ones. Samuel had everything to live for. His family remain devastated and they continue to seek answers for why he was so brutally taken from them. If you don’t want to speak directly to police, you can remain 100% anonymous by giving your information to Crimestoppers, who in turn will pass that information to us. Someone knows something about this murder and I urge those people to do the right thing and share what they know.”

Anyone with information can call the incident room on 020 8785 8267.


(Note: The use of the word ‘unsolved’ here refers to cases where nobody has yet been charged.)

How to Name a Serial Killer

Every report of the case of serial killer Stephen Griffiths referred to him as the ‘Crossbow Cannibal’. But where did this name come from?

Griffiths gave this name when making his first court appearance before Magistrates in May 2010.

He didn’t come up with it himself – because it had already featured in a headline in the Sun newspaper on May 27.

It read: ‘Uni boffin quizzed on crossbow cannibal killings’

This is an example of a journalist ‘dubbing’ a killer, in an attempt to make them more memorable.

‘Dubbing’ in this way is often hotly contested – Stephen Wright, the man who killed five women in the Ipswich area in 2006, was referred to variously as the ‘Suffolk Strangler’, the ‘Ipswich Ripper’, the ‘East Anglian Ripper’ or the ‘Red-light Ripper’.

Usually newspapers steer away from using their rivals’ tags unless they become universally recognised by the public.

This time Griffiths went for something he had read while in custody. He could have come up with his own but it seems he liked the attention he was already getting.

Giving nicknames to serial killers may strike many as gruesome or a glorification of the criminal over his victims, who are quickly forgotten. However, the practice is a long-standing one and must pre-date newspapers.

So what makes a memorable nickname?

  1. Alliteration – Stockwell Strangler, Crossbow Cannibal, Moors Murderers, Beast of the Bastille, Giggling Granny
  2. Rhyme – Gay Slayer, Hannibal the Cannibal
  3. Rhythm – Jack the Ripper, Doctor Death
  4. Allusion / Imitation – Yorkshire Ripper, Angel of Death, The Terminator, Camden Ripper
  5. Novelty – Chessboard Killer, Zodiac Killer, Shoe Fetish Slayer, The Hippopotamus, Teacup Poisoner

A Literary Graph of Murder

What does this graph tell us? It’s meant to show the frequency of the terms murder and homicide in English books from the time of ‘Jack the Ripper’ to the present day.

The answer is probably ‘not much’ – apart from showing that murder is used much more often (in those books that have been scanned by Google) than homicide. Murder also spiked in use at around 1931, which may or may not be related to the output of Agatha Christie and others at that time.

But Google’s Books Ngram Viewer is still an interesting ‘visualisation tool’ which allows anyone to input words or phrases to create their own graph. You can also click different time periods to see which books make up the data.

Examples already doing the rounds include ‘love vs war’ or ‘geek vs nerd’.

Here’s what happens when you type in ‘Jack the Ripper.’

Just to prove it isn’t entirely accurate, closer inspection shows the first blip clocks in at 1883. It turns out these entries result from cataloging based on the founding date of the organisation producing the material or scanning errors caused by ‘OCR’ (Optical Character Recognition).

The database also reveals that in 1894 a bull named Jack the Ripper was listed in the Ayrshire Cattle Herd Book Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

21st Century Court Reporting

Reports that legal history had been made by a judge allowing the use of Twitter in open court for an extradition hearing in London sparked a few earth-shattering predictions.

Was this the end of court reporting as we know it? Could this be ‘possibly the final nail in the coffin of shorthand’? Will court hearings soon be televised? Should everyone be allowed to digitally record proceedings?

The ensuing debate conjured up pin-sharp HD images of a future where legal cases are reported as they happen by a series of tweets, freely available to all at no cost whatsoever.

Compare this to the faded daguerrotype of decrepit court reporters shuffling out of court at the end of proceedings with their notebooks of laboriously written shorthand which has to be transcribed back to English in their heads and then inputted into a computer before being edited, amended, polished and printed on newspapers perused by the few at a price.

Julian Assange
Julian Assange

But let’s not get carried away. For a start, the Julian Assange extradition case is relatively unique. The outcome of the hearing was of interest to a vast international audience and concerned a man who has become the figurehead for a crusade on behalf of openness in government. Wikileaks, the organisation he founded, has been a popular subject on Twitter for months.

As Adam Wagner has said on the UK Human Rights Blog, the power of Twitter ‘lies in its system of replies, followers, categories and retweets, whereby people can research and broadcast information in an extremely specific and targeted way to to the world at large.’

Reporters have been tweeting (and texting) in this way for a long time now, even if it usually has to be done away from the eyes of suspicious court staff. So it is not a new development, it is just that the Times reporter Alexi Mostrous felt it necessary to ask the judge for permission and then publicised the granting of permission. (There are two ways of confronting obstructive rules – ask for permission first or flout and argue later).

While courts have become more lenient about allowing laptops to be used openly (nobody seems to mind an ipad being flipped open), mobile phones are seen as insidious devices designed to break the rules. Journalists are told to turn them off and reprimanded if caught ‘playing’ with them during a case.

No doubt this rule developed because of the frequency that ridiculous ringtones went off every five minutes, but they can also interfere with TV and speaker equipment. And it may sound stupid, but people have tried to take pictures of defendants in the court, no doubt so they can later hang them on their bedroom walls.

And perhaps the idea that the journalist is having fun texting his friends and lovers while everybody else has to concentrate also plays a part.

There are other reasons why this type of hearing was more suited to Twitter. As an extradition case held before a district judge it could be commented upon by whoever cares to share their opinion, whether instantly via twitter or at leisure on their blog.

This does not apply to jury trials where comment is outlawed and prejucidial information not heard by the jury is banned by the Contempt of Court Act. Why? Because it is the received opinion that giving juries every little piece of information would be like handing them a stick of dynamite.

In the world of court, not everything is relevant to the case. How this works in practice has been developed over the centuries. It is the judge’s task to decide what the jury should be told (and in this way he works a bit like an old-style newspaper).

Is it relevant that a rape victim’s sexual history should be laid out in open court? What about a defendant’s list of previous convictions? How about the suspicions and speculations of witnesses and police officers based on rumour and the ‘word on the street’? What exactly counts as ‘evidence’?

There are countless examples of verdicts being overturned because a juror was told how to vote by her husband, or did research on the internet or visited the murder scene on their own or generally tried to take up their deerstalker and pipe and investigate the case themselves.

Counter to this establishment fear of being held to ransom by ill-educated and easily-swayed juries runs the growing feeling that there should be more trust in the public. Are they not capable of deciding what is relevant and what is not? This is to a certain extent how the system works in the US, although they have a complicated jury selection process which strikes most British observers as deeply strange. Here in the UK we select at random, discriminating neither by age, race, religion or intelligence.

So it’s about trust. And if open tweeting from court is going to increase interest and trust in the workings of our justice system then that can only be a good thing. Likewise cameras in court – they will neither bring down the system or replace journalists, they will hopefully augment both.

All this doesn’t mean that court reporting is dead. It just means that like everything else it is being improved and adapted as time goes by. There will always be a market for an entertaining report of court proceedings. It isn’t always just about the result.

Equally it doesn’t mean that shorthand is dead, despite its reputation for being antiquated and unnecessary now that lovely shiny digital recorders are available. Recorders are fine for those who aren’t working to a tight deadline but they are absolutely useless for those occasions when people want accurate and readable copy of more than 140 characters within 20 minutes.

Paradoxically this is a skill that has been on the decline in recent years as newspapers cut back and bring their deadlines forward to save money.

But when people have turned away from printed newspapers talking about yesterday’s news and started favouring the internet with its ever-shifting front pages, surely shorthand is more important than ever? It is a skill that places the competent reporter with an advantage over their rivals at a time when it appears that everyone wants to be a journalist.

In a world where the norm is for news to be provided for free, quality will be king.

Third Time Lucky? The case of Anthony Carter

It could almost be a scientific experiment.

Take one murder case, subject it to three trials, each with different juries, and await the results. Would you expect the verdicts to be the same?

This actually happened to Anthony Carter, a 37 year-old man who was suspected of shooting a hotel waiter dead during a £50 ‘drug deal gone wrong’ in Tottenham in 1998.

Anthony Carter

Carter was linked to the crime by his DNA found on a baseball cap found clutched in the victim’s hand at the scene and an alleged confession he made to his ex-girlfriend ten years later. He was not identified by eyewitnesses and he denied being the gunman.

His defence was that his cap had gone missing some time earlier and that his former partner was being vindictive to get full control of their child.

Carter first went on trial in January 2009 but the jury was unable to reach a majority verdict and was discharged.

The retrial began in June 2009 and this time he was convicted and jailed for life with a minimum of 20 years behind bars.

But the story didn’t end there.

Carter’s lawyers appealed the decision of the trial judge to allow the jury to be told of a conviction for possession of a gun after the murder took place. The appeal court directed that he be tried a third time, this time without mention of that information.

At the third and final trial in November 2010, Carter was cleared of murder by the jury and left court a free man.

Three different juries, three different verdicts.

We are not allowed to know what goes on in a jury room so exactly what influences their collective decision is unknown.

However the jury was not the only variable in this experiment. The third trial was overseen by a different judge, presented by a different prosecutor and took place in a different courtroom. No doubt the accounts of the witnesses and even the defendant at court varied slightly.

And perhaps the knowledge that Carter had handled a gun, even if it postdated the crime, may have tipped reasonable doubt into certainty of guilt.

But if this case reveals anything, it is how one decision made by 12 members of the public can completely change a life. It is perhaps for this reason that some people want to do away with juries altogether.